Cases 41 - 50 of 285
Chevrefils v. Holm et al
as 1:2021cv00867
Defendant:
Kenneth Holm and Statewide Transport, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Branden Chevrefils
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter v. C R England Inc
as 2:2021cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Cole, Beau Bogunovich, Laura Nelson and others
Defendant:
C R England Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Estate of Tomas Beauford, et al v. Correct Care Solutions, et al
as 21-1010
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, INC., CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES, INC., DR. KURT HOLMES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIFFANY MARSH, personally and as representative of the estate of Tomas Beauford and ESTATE OF TOMAS BEAUFORD
Bennett v. Ruminski et al
as 1:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Sheila Ruminski, Stephen Holmes and Jeff Schrader
Plaintiff:
Paul Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crystal Lagoons US Corp et al v. Desert Color Manager et al
as 2:2020cv00851
Plaintiff:
Crystal Lagoons Technologies and Crystal Lagoons US Corp
Defendant:
Sullivan Homes, Tri-State Ventures doing business as Carefree Homes, Holmes Homes and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Jarvis v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2020cv02028
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Mesa County, Matt Lewis, Kurtis Holmes and others
Plaintiff:
James Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vann (ID 76997) v. Fewell et al
as 5:2020cv03200
Defendant:
John Doe, J. Patrick, (fnu) Schuler and others
Plaintiff:
Durayl Vann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Archer v. Holms
as 1:2020cv01247
Plaintiff:
Rick Archer
Defendant:
Holms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 bv
Pike v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2020cv01179
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Art Smith, Lori McLaughlin and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Pike
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
