Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Lovelace v. Howard
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-7072
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM LOVELACE
Respondent - Appellee:
BRUCE HOWARD
Howse v. Torres et al
as 2:2009cv00784
Plaintiff:
James William Howse
Defendant:
Ron Torres, FNU Torres and Fnu Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Mestas, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 09-1236
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
C. MESTAS, C/O, J. JONES, AW, H. A. RIOS, Warden and others
Williams v. Mestas et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2009cv00331
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
C. Mestas, J. Jones, H. A. Rios and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. Mestas et al
as 1:2008cv01621
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
C. Mestas, J. Jones, H. A. Rios and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lovelace v Dinwiddie
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2007cv00224
Plaintiff:
James William Lovelace
Defendant:
Walter Dinwiddie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mondragon v. Thompson, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 06-2358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MONDRAGON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WILLIAM THOMPSON, Probation Officer, State of New Mexico, in his individual capacity and JOSE LEON FLORES, Supervisor, New Mexico Department of Corrections, Probation & Parole Division, in his individual capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.