Cases 41 - 50 of 923
In re: Wood
as 23-6129
Petitioner:
TREMANE WOOD
Respondent:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6123
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Wisdom Ministries v. Garrett, et al
as 23-5098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WISDOM MINISTRIES, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLISON D. GARRETT, Chancellor of the Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, in her official capacity and OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION
Edwards v. Oklahoma State Reformatory et al
as 5:2023cv00716
Plaintiff:
Leellis Edwards
Defendant:
Oklahoma State Reformatory and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AKG v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
AKG, Austin Gunter, Aaron Vanbuskirk and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, John Canavan, Tracy McDaniel and others
McIntosh v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
Donyeil Jerome McIntosh
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Quick
as 23-6095
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY CASTILLO SANCHEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ANITA TRAMMELL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary and CHRISTE QUICK, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Bolin v. Oklahoma, State of
as 4:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Bolin
Defendant:
Oklahoma, State of and State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gray v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Derreck Ryan Gray
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Davis Correctional Facility, James Yate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Proctor v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Eric Lee Proctor
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, United States of America and Grady County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
