Cases 51 - 60 of 1,204
Farnham (PS) v. State of Florida
as 1:2023cv02083
Petitioner:
Ronald Russell Farnham
Respondent:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neasbitt v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Russell E. Neasbitt
Respondent:
Christie Quick, Greg Breslin and Wallace Coppedge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lund (ID 75009) v. Miller et al
as 5:2023cv03184
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Lund
Defendant:
Lou Miller and Russell Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bulow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 6:2023cv00246
Plaintiff:
Russell A. Bulow
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Ellefson et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 6:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Russell Ellefson and Joshua Zongker
Defendant:
General Electric Company and GE Layoff Plan for Salaried Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00622
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Forsyth v. Abendigos et al
as 6:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Russell D. Forsyth
Defendant:
Abendigos and Hochatown Original, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ezell v. Cole et al
as 5:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
James Ezell, III
Defendant:
David Cole, FNU Russell, FNU Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
