Cases 61 - 70 of 823
In re: Evans
as 22-3179
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZABRIEL EVANS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Evans v. State of Kansas
as 22-3161
Petitioner / Appellant:
ZABRIEL EVANS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Evans v. Williams
as 1:2022cv02085
Petitioner:
Chun Evans
Respondent:
Dean Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Department of the Army, Defense Health Agency, Evans Army Community Hospital, Fort Carson Colorado et al
as 1:2022cv02069
Plaintiff:
Rachel Evans
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Defense Health Agency, Evans Army Community Hospital, Fort Carson Colorado, Lindsey Barizza, Edward Mandril and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wrenn v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Defendant:
Scott Pruitt, Mike Hunter, John O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2022cv03147
Petitioner:
Zabriel Leon Evans
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Brigham Young University
as 22-4050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSCOE EVANS, an individual on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY, a Utah corporation
Evans v. Ensey et al
as 1:2022cv01491
Plaintiff:
Chun Evans
Defendant:
Ensey, Larry Cox, Steven Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1451 Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
