Cases 71 - 80 of 85
Rollins v. Haskell, Town of
as 6:2008cv00309
Plaintiff:
Sonja Rollins
Defendant:
Haskell, Town of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cobb v. Winder et al
as 2:2008cv00582
Plaintiff:
Brent Mayon Cobb
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Beau Babka, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cobb v. Winder et al
as 2:2008cv00279
Plaintiff:
Brent Mayon Cobb
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Beau Babka, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sump et al v. Clay County Kansas et al
as 5:2008cv04038
Plaintiff:
Faith Sump and Rollin E. Sump
Defendant:
Clay County Kansas and State of Kansas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dansie et al v. Eaton Corp et al
as 2:2007cv00963
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dansie, Thomas Dansie, Catherine Dansie and others
Defendant:
Eaton Corp, Dana Corporation, Westinghouse Electric Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dunlap v. Jones et al
as 6:2007cv00380
Plaintiff:
Marcus P. Dunlap
Defendant:
Justin Jones, Larry Rollins and Marty Sirmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beauchaine v. Winder et al
as 2:2007cv00657
Plaintiff:
Dennis Beauchaine
Defendant:
James M. Winder, Rollin Cook, Mike Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Mink et al
as 1:2007cv01821
Plaintiff:
Arthur W. Goodman
Defendant:
Ted Mink, Palansky, Stiles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Kay County Jail et al
as 5:2007cv00507
Plaintiff:
Michael Rollins
Defendant:
Kay County Jail, Everette Vanhoesen and Stephanie Ringgold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Administrative Rev
as 07-9521
Not A Party In Lower Court - Petitioner:
DARRELL ROLLINS, an individual
Not A Party In Lower Court - Respondent:
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.
Intervenor:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
