Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Spencer (ID 126729) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Michaela Lea Spencer
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger (ID 126377) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03069
Plaintiff:
Kimberley S. Younger
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Liles (ID 122198) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Kora L. Liles
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett (ID 122203) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lockett
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz (ID 124145) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03068
Plaintiff:
Barbara Marie Frantz
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
Elzie Wayne Hooks, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Totally Hooked LLC
as 2:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Totally Hooked LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
In Re: Totally Hooked, LLC
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Totally Hooked, LLC
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Placeholder
Defendant:
Defendant Placeholder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Stauch (ID 129417) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Letecia Stauch
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus, Donna Hook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Broken Arrow, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Harold Price
Defendant:
Broken Arrow, City of, Michael Spurgeon, Kenneth Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
