Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00602
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Stevenson et al
as 1:2024cv00571
Defendant:
FNU Stevenson, FNU Brown and FNU Horton
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salas v. Horton, et al
as 24-2084
Petitioner:
PAUL STEPHEN SALAS
Respondent:
VINCENT HORTON, Warden and HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Kessler v. Tri State Motor Transit Co. et al
as 6:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Justin D. Kessler and Justin Dewayne Kessler
Defendant:
Tri State Motor Transit Co., Daniel Stark, Ruth Green and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Prescott (PS) v. Horton et al
as 1:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Billy E. Horton, Marjorie Kovacevich, Emily J. Mielsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Grady County Jail, et al
as 24-6003
Plaintiff:
OTIS MAYS
Defendant:
GRADY COUNTY JAIL, GRADY COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER, FNU CARPENTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dunn, et al v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al
as 23-2181
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL ANDERSON, BROOKE BALOCCA, SARA BENSON and others
Defendant / Appellant:
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC.
Horton v. Tayloe, et al
as 23-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. HORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD EMMITT TAYLOE, MICHAEL CHARLES FLANAGAN, GERLAD FRANK NEUWIRTH and others
Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company, et al v. Dunn, et al
as 23-706
Petitioner:
SANTA FE NATURAL TOBACCO COMPANY, INC., REYNOLDS AMERICAN, INC. and R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY
Respondent:
ANTHONY DUNN, CEYHAN HAKSAL, MICHAEL ROBINSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
