Cases 1 - 10 of 3,342
Jones (PS) v. Deines et al
as 1:2024cv01429
Plaintiff:
Adam Jones
Defendant:
Curtis Deines, April Ogley, Robert Dick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Day et al
as 6:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Jones
Defendant:
Jeremy Day and Trisha Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones (ID 98286) v. Langford
as 5:2024cv03065
Petitioner:
Austin Jones
Respondent:
Donald Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandt v. Cimarron Correctional Facility and Staff, et al
as 24-6089
Plaintiff:
DONNA R. BRANDT
Defendant:
CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND STAFF, TERRACE DICKERSON, Former Warden, FNU GRANTE, Assistance Warden and others
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Roger John Donald Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nicholson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Leon Nicholson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Zook, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Monzon
as 1:2024cv01192
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Jones
Defendant:
Matthew Monzon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6078
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
