Cases 1 - 10 of 809
Weinert v. State of Oklahoma
as 6:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Steven Alexander Weinert
Respondent:
State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin (PS) et al v. Roybal et al
as 1:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Mary C. Austin and Alexander L. Austin
Defendant:
Joseph Roybal, El County Paso Jail, Michael J. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Raymond C Evans
Defendant:
FNU Walker
Respondent:
Grady County Jail, Jim Gorlach, FNU Cade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Loggins v. Huffman et al
as 6:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Lee Anthony Loggins
Defendant:
J. Huffman, C. Kirkland, Unknown Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. State Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00629
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson and Kiki Kenyatia P.R. Lombard-Knapp
Defendant:
City Gale Apartments, Alexander, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
McGee (ID 113662) v. Kansas Department of Corrections
as 5:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Antonio Alexander McGee
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stickelberger v. General Security National Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv00386
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stickelberger
Defendant:
General Security National Insurance Company and Branch Financial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United States v. Santiago
as 24-6015
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXANDER WILLIAM SANTIAGO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
