Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Luginbyhl v. Moore, et al
as 24-6102
Plaintiff:
LEVI LUGINBYHL
Defendant:
DARRELL L. MOORE, JUDGE PHILLIP C. CORLEY, CIMARRON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, AKA Core Civic and others
Luginbyhl v. Moore et al
as 5:2023cv00939
Defendant:
Cimarron Correctional Facility, Darrell L Moore, Judge Phillip C Corley and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Luginbyhl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roman v. Miller et al
as 6:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roman
Defendant:
Jeffery Miller, Fred Corley, Katie Bray Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Corley Nissan, LLC
as 1:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Defendant:
Corley Nissan, LLC doing business as ED Corley Nissan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Corley v. USA
as 1:2022cv00335
Petitioner:
Nathan Corley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Moyer v. Thomas et al
as 5:2021cv00817
Defendant:
Mary Stinnett, Katherine E Thomas, Phillip C Corley and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ashley Moyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tolbert v. Thayer et al
as 1:2020cv00269
Defendant:
Catherine Zarkos, Dee A Sanchez, Ann Halter and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Auburn Tolbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Corley
as 5:2019cv01184
Plaintiff:
Leray Richards and Le'Ray Eugene Richards
Defendant:
J Corley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corley et al v. Pine Ridge Equine Hospital, PLLC et al
as 4:2019cv00411
Plaintiff:
Corion, LLC and Anna Corley
Defendant:
Garrett Metcalf and Pine Ridge Equine Hospital, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation v. Corley Nissan, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00427
Defendant:
Eddie B. Corley, Sr., Debora M. Money, Corley Nissan, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
