Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Chaney v. Bridges
as 6:2024cv00338
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Petitioner:
Donald Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chaney v. Singh et al
as 5:2024cv00810
Defendant:
Surinderpal Singh and Dhillon Bros Trucking Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles Chaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
United States of America v. $1,888.00 United States Currency et al
as 6:2024cv01130
Defendant:
$1,888.00 in United States Currency and $975.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Davonte Chaney
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States v. Chaney
as 23-3240
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVONTE LARON CHANEY
Chaney v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, Municipal Attorney's Office for the City of Oklahoma, Andrew Haskins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney v. DRG Invest et al
as 5:2023cv00842
Plaintiff:
James E Chaney, Jr
Defendant:
DRG Invest Owner of Property doing business as Kentucky Pines Apartment, Goldman and Assoc, Linda Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chaney v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Larry Chaney
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
