Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Bowlds v. Oklahoma Indigent Defense System et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Charles R Bowlds
Defendant:
Oklahoma Indigent Defense System, Tim Laughlin, Cindy Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowlds v. Bridges
as 5:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
Charles R Bowlds
Respondent:
Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Babakr v. Fowles, et al
as 23-3026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUZAFAR BABAKR
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. JACOB T. FOWLES, DR. DOROTHY M. DALEY, DR. STEVEN W. MAYNARD-MOODY and others
Clark v. Colorado Division of Securities, The, et al.
as 1:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
CDS, Colorado Division of Securities, The, United States Securities Exchange Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R. et al v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois et al
as 2:2021cv00186
Plaintiff:
T. R., Charles R. and Erica R.
Defendant:
Quantitative Risk Management PPO Plan and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Stewart v. Turn Key Health et al
as 5:2020cv00957
Plaintiff:
Charles R Stewart
Defendant:
Leandra James, Turn Key Health, Matthew Sumner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Haswood
as 20-2057
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLEY HASWOOD, AKA Charles R. Haswood
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Babakr v. Goerdel et al
as 2:2020cv02037
Defendant:
Dorothy M. Daley, Jacob T. Fowles, Charles R. Epp and others
Plaintiff:
Muzafar Babakr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SEC v. Kokesh
as 19-2000
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES R. KOKESH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Glaze v. Hamilton
as 5:2018cv00661
Petitioner:
Charles R Glaze
Respondent:
Casey Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
