Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Beales et al v. Duffield et al
as 2:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Toren Beales, Carli Brady and Michael Srygler
Defendant:
Thomas Duffield and Lehi City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGinnes v. Rothrock et al
as 4:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee McGinnes
Defendant:
Katie Rothrock, Mrs Galardo, Mr Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duffield v. Bear
as 5:2018cv00739
Petitioner:
Wesley Duffield
Respondent:
FNU Bear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Duffield v. Bear et al
as 5:2018cv00402
Petitioner:
Wesley Duffield
Respondent:
FNU Bear and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Duffield et al v. MPC Pipelines Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
John Duffield and Kaye Duffield
Defendant:
MPC Pipelines Inc , Duffield Construction LLC , Murphy Pipe and Civil LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Duffield v. Sonberg
as 1:2012cv00179
Defendant:
Richard T Sonberg
Plaintiff:
O F Duffield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duffield v. Sonberg
as 1:2011cv00015
Plaintiff:
O F Duffield
Defendant:
Richard T Sonberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mills v. Sedgwick County Kansas et al
as 6:2009cv01192
Plaintiff:
Edward Joe Mills
Defendant:
Sedgwick County Kansas, Sedgwick County Department of Corrections, Judge James V Riddel Boys' Ranch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kenney et al v. Arnold Transportation Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00239
Plaintiff:
Debra Kenney and Glen Kenney
Defendant:
Arnold Transportation Services, Inc., Great West Casualty Company and Donald Duffield, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Thorwald et al v. Gordon Sevig Trucking Co
as 1:2008cv00142
Plaintiff:
Frank Thorwald and Florine Duffield
Defendant:
Gordon Sevig Trucking Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
