Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Jackson v. Hicks et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Corey Jackson
Defendant:
Jason Hicks, Cortnie Siess, Melody Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Edmond City of et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Glynn Simmons
Defendant:
Edmond City of, Anthony David Garrett, Oklahoma City City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Opene Investment Solutions LLC v. Neighbors et al
as 5:2023cv00894
Defendant:
Spouse of Mark A Neighbors, Mark A Neighbors, Pamela L Neighbors and others
Plaintiff:
Opene Investment Solutions LLC
Cross Defendant:
Oklahoma Tax Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Amuwo v. Chang et al
as 1:2023cv02537
Plaintiff:
Quamdeen Adewale Amuwo
Defendant:
Edmond E. Chang, L. Douglas Manschreck, Matthew Moyer and others
Lynn v. Willnauer, et al
as 23-3111
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK C. LYNN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLIE WILLNAUER, MARY YOAKUM, TONI SINCLAIR and others
Stricklin v. Edmond City of Oklahoma
as 5:2023cv00418
Defendant:
Edmond City of Oklahoma and The Edmond Police Department
Plaintiff:
Keely Stricklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6065
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tahermandarjani v. Edmond City of et al
as 5:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Spencer Tahermandarjani
Defendant:
Edmond City of, JOHN DOE, 1 and JOHN DOE, 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
City of Edmond v. Lawrence et al
as 5:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
City of Edmond
Defendant:
Clyde W Lawrence, FNU LNU, James A Ebert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
