Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Christ Ctr Divine Philosophy v. Elam
as 19-6186
Defendant / Appellant:
ELLEN VERONICA ELAM
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRIST CENTER OF DIVINE PHILOSOPHY, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Elam v. McClain County Independant District No 15
as 5:2019cv00387
Defendant:
McClain County Independant District No 15 and Purcell School District
Plaintiff:
Jamie Elam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foreman v. Elam, et al
as 19-7020
Defendant / Appellee:
JONNA PERRY, Case manager at Jackie Brannon Correctional Center and in her individual capacity, SERGEANT DAVID SUMMERS, and in his individual capacity, ROBERT RICHARD EDDE, M.D., Jess Dunn Correctional Center and in his individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASA S. FOREMAN, AKA Asa S. Forman
Elam v. Dowling et al
as 5:2019cv00223
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Petitioner:
Mark Ronald Elam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lang et al v. Winston Trans Inc et al
as 6:2019cv00061
Plaintiff:
Larzetta Lang and Elam Lang
Defendant:
Clyde Savage and Winston Trans Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Winston Trans Inc et al
as 6:2019cv00030
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Clark
Defendant:
Clyde Savage and Winston Trans Inc.
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Elam Lang and Larzetta Lang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foreman v. Elam et al
as 6:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Asa S. Foreman
Defendant:
Teresa Deloris Elam, Robert Richard Edde, Michelle Lehnus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dirks v. Elam, et al
as 16-3183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR R. DIRKS
Defendant - Appellee:
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF FORD COUNTY, KANSAS, EDWARD W. ELAM and MARTIN BOLMER
United States v. Barber
as 16-3170
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM ELAM BARBER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
