Cases 1 - 10 of 415
Martinez v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv01234
Defendant:
Harvey Parker and FNU LNU
Plaintiff:
Arthur Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Ciolli, et al
as 24-1420
Petitioner:
NORVELL WEBSTER CRUMP
Respondent:
C. HARVEY, ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Campbell v. Choctaw Nation et al
as 6:2024cv00380
Defendant:
Richard E. Brannon, Terry Park, Kara Bacon and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Douglas Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill (PS) v. Ciolli et al
as 1:2024cv02658
Defendant:
A. Ciolli, D. English, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
David E. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Killebrew et al v. Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02583
Plaintiff:
Harvey Scates and Bobby Killebrew
Defendant:
Lazydays Mile Hi RV, LLC and Tiffin Motor Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Harvey (PS) v. Saccamano
as 1:2024cv02555
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Harvey
Defendant:
Raven Saccamano, Filer and Rinehart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris-Blake (PS) v. Sam Stretton et al
as 1:2024cv02435
Defendant:
Textream, Comcast, Amazon.com and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Morris-Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Hudson et al
as 5:2024cv03117
Defendant:
(fnu) Troll, (fnu) Rockhold, Donald Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Monare Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02284
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Strobel v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv03105
Defendant:
(fnu) Colson, (fnu) Belter, (fnu) Thomson and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Robert Strobel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
