Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Higgins v. Bernalillo County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Rachel Higgins
Defendant:
Bernalillo County Board of Commissioners, Jason Jones, Stephen Gabaldon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421 Aliens and Nationality
Johnson v. Chapin, et al
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID CHAPIN, JESSICA AGGSON, FNU STEIN, Lt. and others
Ricks (PS) v. Diggins et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
John Allen Ricks
Respondent:
Elias Higgins, Phillip J. Weiser and Elias Diggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson (PS) v. Chapin et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
David Chapin, Jessica Aggson, FNU Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 5 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Chapin et al
as 1:2023cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jabari J Johnson
Defendant:
David Chapin, Jessica Aggson, FNU Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Egli v. USDC District of Utah et al
as 2:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Egli
Defendant:
USDC District of Utah doing business as Trina A Higgins, Karin Fojtik and U.S. Attorney General doing business as Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
