Cases 1 - 10 of 12
McIntyre, et al v. Golubski, et al
as 22-3115
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAMONTE MCINTYRE and ROSE LEE MCINTYRE
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER GOLUBSKI, Detective
Defendant:
UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY AND KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, DENNIS WARE, Detective, JAMES L. BROWN, officer and others
McIntyre et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas et al
as 2:2018cv02545
Defendant:
Estate of James Michael Krstolich, Dennis Ware, W. K. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Lamonte McIntyre and Rose Lee McIntyre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Kern, et al
as 13-3048
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. BROWN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ARON KERN, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Office, (FNU) CLARK, MARC BENNETT, District Attorney and others
Brown, Sr. v. State of Kansa
as 13-3002
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES L. BROWN, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Brown v. Sedgwick Co. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 12-3324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. BROWN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SEDGWICK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ARON KERN, Detective # 1714, MARK BENNETT, Sedgwick County District Attorney's Office and others
Brown, Sr. v. State of Kansa
as 12-3320
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES L. BROWN, SR.
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS
Brown v. Kern et al
as 5:2012cv03236
Plaintiff:
James L. Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
Aron Kern, (fnu) Clark, Marc Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. KSNW-TV New
as 12-3286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. BROWN, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
KSNW-TV NEWS
Brown v. Kansas, State of
as 5:2012cv03206
Petitioner:
James L. Brown, Sr.
Respondent:
Kansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. KSNW-TV News
as 5:2012cv03123
Plaintiff:
James L. Brown, Sr.
Defendant:
KSNW-TV News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
