Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 834
Manning v. Jordan et al
as 6:2024cv00198
Plaintiff: Patrick Manning, II
Defendant: C.O. Jordan and Warden Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponder v. Fire Insurance Company, The
as 6:2024cv01088
Plaintiff: Jordan Ponder
Defendant: Fire Insurance Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rich (PS) v. Feyan et al
as 1:2024cv01496
Plaintiff: Jordan Rich
Defendant: John Feyan, Jessica L. Kern, John P. Martens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Falcon Insurance Company v. Ratto et al
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff: Falcon Insurance Company
Defendant: Jaqueline Ratto, Fransisco Alarcon, R. A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Jones et al v. Nielsen et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff: Kalie Jones and Nicholas Stephen Hulse
Defendant: Judge Douglas Nielsen, Moody John R., Cleave Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Holt
as 24-7044
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JORDAN WAYNE HOLT
Jordan v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff: Shonna Leigh Jordan
Defendant: Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jordan v. Harpe
as 24-6090
Petitioner: RAY ROGER JORDAN
Respondent: SCOTT CROW, Director and STEVEN HARPE, Director
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00219
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hopper et al v. Weygand et al
as 4:2024cv00212
Plaintiff: Keith-Dewane Hopper and Deanna-Lyn Dale
Defendant: Jordan Weygand, Robert Glasby, Steven Kunzweiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?