Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Steele v. Davis et al
as 5:2023cv03192
Plaintiff:
Lamar Ray Steele, Jr.
Defendant:
Ronald L. Davis, D. Hudson, (fnu) Grecco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Spensley v. Kuhlman et al
as 5:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Douglas H Spensley
Defendant:
Johnny L Kuhlman, John & Jane Doe(s) and Ronald L Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Davis v. Washington County Sheriff et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Washington County Sheriff, Southern Health Partners and Colorado Health Network
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kristich v. Core Civic, et al
as 22-2003
Petitioner:
MATTHEW MARTINEZ, SIRAJ WAHHAJ, MATTHEW VON ROTZ and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ORIN KRISTICH
Respondent / Appellee:
CORE CIVIC, LUIS ROSA, JR., Warden, Cibola Correctional Center, in his individual capacity, SONYA K. CHAVEZ, United States Marshal for the District of New Mexico and others
Strader (ID 66677) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2021cv03204
Plaintiff:
James C. Strader and Craig James Strader
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, Sam A. Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Davis
as 21-7030
Respondent:
SCOTT CROW, director of Okla. Department of Corractions
Petitioner:
ALVIN L. DAVIS, JR.
Davis et al v. Morgan et al
as 6:2021cv00029
Defendant:
Shirley Dionne Garrett Webster, R. D. Mead, M. G. McCaslin and others
Plaintiff:
Lindsey R. Davis and Jared L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
