Cases 1 - 10 of 97
Shaik v. Melton et al
as 6:2024cv00252
Defendant:
Rebecca Johnson, Darin Rogers, Ben Flowers and others
Plaintiff:
Zak Shaik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaik et al. v. Williams et al.
as 6:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Zak Shaik and Baari Ardmore Housing, LLC
Defendant:
Mark Melton, James A. Williams, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coulter v. Butler et al
as 5:2024cv00835
Defendant:
City of Norman, Jared Butler and Ashleigh Melton
Plaintiff:
Alicia D Coulter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimbrough v. Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Rachel Kimbrough
Defendant:
Board of Trustees for the Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority, Board of County Commissioners of Oklahoma County Oklahoma, Lisa Hooker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00119
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Malone-Melton v. Harpe
as 4:2023cv00101
Petitioner:
Gregory Kyle Malone-Melton
Respondent:
Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-5070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
RX Medical LLC et al v. Melton et al
as 5:2022cv00731
Plaintiff:
RX Medical LLC, ROK Sales LLC and ROK Medical Managment LLC
Defendant:
Rob Melton, Justin Poos, Brady Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Malone-Melton
as 22-5068
Petitioner:
In re: GREGORY KYLE MALONE-MELTON
Respondent:
SCOTT CROW
Melton v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Melton
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, M. Carvajal, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
