Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation v. Haff Poultry, et al
as 24-602
Petitioner:
PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORPORATION
Respondent:
HAFF POULTRY, INC., NANCY BUTLER, JOHNNY UPCHURCH and others
Myles v. Walmart, et al
as 24-3038
Plaintiff:
BRACEY MYLES and ALFREDA LANG
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., DBA Walmart Supercenter #378 and WALMART DE
Myles v. Walmart, et al
as 24-3026
Plaintiff:
BRACEY MYLES and ALFREDA LANG
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., DBA Walmart Supercenter #378 and WALMART DE
Hanchett v. Sheriff of Cleveland County et al
as 5:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hanchett
Defendant:
Sheriff of Cleveland County, Turn Key Health Clinics LLC, Diana Myles-Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Coady v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Myles Thomas Coady
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Myles et al v. Walmart Inc.
as 5:2022cv04069
Plaintiff:
Bracey Myles and Alfeda Lang
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and WALMART DE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gomez v. Polis
as 1:2022cv02663
Plaintiff:
Justin Brian Gomez
Defendant:
Jared Polis, State of Colorado Judicial Department, Randall Arp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers et al v. Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County et al
as 4:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
Ashley Myers and Courtney Vaughn
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Rogers County, Scott Walton, Kellie Guess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright et al v. Aspen Airport-ASE et al
as 1:2022cv00077
Plaintiff:
Lashawnda Wright and Bernard Myles Albury
Defendant:
Snowmass, Aspen Airport: ASE, Aspen Airport-ASE and others
JMC General Contractor, LLC v. Richards
as 1:2021cv02302
Petitioner:
JMC General Contractor, LLC
Defendant:
Myles Richards
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
