Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Norwood v. Oklahoma State of
as 5:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Samuel Earl Norwood
Respondent:
Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (state)
Hershberger v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Michelle Hershberger
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Joseph Norwood and David Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patterson v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Carl Patterson
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., Joseph Norwood, Connor Whitlock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drew v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Drew
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., James Yates, Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Westbrook v. Lysinger et al
as 6:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Frederick Maurice Westbrook and Maurice
Defendant:
Jamie Lysinger, Serena Brewer, Joe Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00245
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Gray v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00615
Plaintiff:
Derreck Ryan Gray
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Davis Correctional Facility, James Yate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ray v. Norwood
as 6:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Eric S. Ray
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hooks v. Blocker et al
as 6:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dewayne Hooks
Defendant:
Blocker, Joe Norwood, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
