Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 692
Hudson v. Bridges
as 5:2024cv00561
Petitioner: Roy Hudson
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Plaintiff: Michael Roy Lee
Defendant: FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armendariz, et al v. City of Colorado Springs, et al
as 24-1201
Plaintiff: JACQUELINE ARMENDARIZ and CHINOOK CENTER
Defendant: CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, DANIEL SUMMEY, in his individual capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
King et al v. Monsanto Company
as 6:2024cv00161
Plaintiff: Roy King and Linda King
Defendant: Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States v. Wayt
as 24-8023
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: GLEN ROY WAYT
Bozarth (PS) v. Board of County Commissioner et al
as 1:2024cv01102
Plaintiff: James R. Bozarth
Defendant: Board of County Commissioner, Joe Roy, Wellpath Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Lovell et al
as 5:2024cv00156
Plaintiff: Douglas Roy Cross, Jr
Defendant: Bryan Lovell, Logan Niles, FNU Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavazos v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner: Roy G Cavazos
Respondent: Hector Rios and Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Adams, et al
as 24-4026
Petitioner: LARRY ADAMS, JED R. CHRISTENSEN, KIRK R. HARRISON and others
Respondent: ROY NIELSEN HAFEN and WILLIAM T. THURMAN
Henson v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff: Kenneth Roy Henson, Jr.
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?