Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Empire Staple Co. v. SouthernCarlson, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
EMPIRE STAPLE CO.
Defendant:
SouthernCarlson, Inc. and James J. Wydra
Garrett v. Anderson et al
as 6:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Anderson, Errol R. Arthur, Julie Becker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. Staples
as 4:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Watkins, III
Defendant:
Joshua Bradley Staples
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MRG v. Toussaint et al
as 1:2023cv00529
Plaintiff:
Meleaha Glapion-Pressley and MRG
Defendant:
Don Toussaint, Echo Ryan, Charles Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Halls v. Staples
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Franklin Eric Halls
Defendant:
Joshua Bradley Staples and Mike Palmer
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
American Wild Horse Campaign et al v. Haaland et al
as 1:2021cv02146
Plaintiff:
American Wild Horse Campaign, Skydog Ranch & Sanctuary, Clare Staples and others
Defendant:
Debra Haaland and US Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Lamb v. Staples et al
as 4:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Lamb, Jr
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Town of Fairfax, Krista Dawn Staples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Staples v. CIR
as 20-9006
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK STAPLES
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Vance et al v. Belnick LLC et al
as 5:2019cv00862
Plaintiff:
Karen Backiel and Thomas Vance
Defendant:
Staples Inc and Belnick LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
