Cases 1 - 10 of 2,157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Himelstieb v. Brandenburg, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
TYLER HIMELSTIEB
Defendant:
BRANDENBURG, Mental Health Clinician and TERRY MARTINEZ, Prison Nurse
Merrill v. BNSF Railway Company
as 6:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Terry J. Merrill
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Terry, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 24-6046
Plaintiff:
SINCERE TERRY, MIA HOGSETT, TYREKE BAKER and others
Defendant:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Attorney General and VICKI ZEMP BEHENNA, in her official capacity as the Oklahoma County District Attorney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Discrimination)
Konecny v. State of Texas, et al
as 24-1091
Plaintiff:
J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant:
STATE OF TEXAS, COLLIN COUNTY TEXAS, TARRANT COUNTY TEXAS and others
Holz v. Linsay
as 5:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Terry Linsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Betts (PS) v. Long
as 1:2024cv01164
Petitioner:
Terry Betts
Respondent:
Jeff Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
