Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03371
Plaintiff:
Omer Mohamed
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03354
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 American With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Bryant-Taylor v. Al-Omran et al
as 1:2023cv02126
Plaintiff:
Monica G. Bryant-Taylor
Defendant:
Hassan A. Al-Omran, Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Glaser v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Beck Glaser
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Does 1 Through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
M.H. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
M.H.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Does 1 Through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Wakeman v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Julie Wakeman
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc, Uber USA, LLC, Rasier, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Maez v. Kiser et al
as 1:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Maez
Defendant:
Jordan Scott Kiser and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Maez v. Kiser et al
as 1:2023cv00168
Defendant:
Jordan Scott Kiser, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Sandra M. Maez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Valentine v. James River Insurance Company, et al
as 22-1323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELET VALENTINE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC
Valentine v. James River Insurance, et al
as 22-1175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELET VALENTINE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RAISER, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
