Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,837
Wenger et al v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv01100
Plaintiff: Micah Wenger and Tamara Wenger
Defendant: Jared Blaine Johnson, Parker Montgomery, Jaci Latham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Salazar-Salazar (PS) v. Celia
as 1:2024cv01640
Petitioner: Roger Javier Salazar-Salazar
Respondent: Celia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ibarra v. Lee, et al
as 24-5070
Plaintiff: ROSALINDA IBARRA, as the Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jorge Martinez, deceased
Defendant: CHEYENNE LEE and BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF ROGERS
Rogers v. Wyoming Attorney General, et al
as 24-8038
Petitioner: SEAN ROGERS
Respondent: WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF WYOMING and WYOMING DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS STATE PENITENTIARY WARDEN, in her official capacity, AKA Neicole Molden
United States v. Rogers
as 24-3075
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RAYMOND L. ROGERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01379
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Accommodations)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00345
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sparks (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2024cv01373
Plaintiff: Rustin Dean Sparks
Defendant: Andre Stancil, Marshall Griffith, Ryan Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Harpe
as 24-6090
Petitioner: RAY ROGER JORDAN
Respondent: SCOTT CROW, Director and STEVEN HARPE, Director
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff: Roger John Donald Jones
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?