Cases 61 - 70 of 126
Kister v. Jones (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00606
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shack v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00426
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Patrice Richie Jones, Benard Fitzpatrick and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Shack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00343
Defendant:
CO White, Alabama Department of Corrections, Patrice Richie Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Luther Clark, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Johnson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00370
Defendant:
Captain McCovery, Patrice Richie Jones, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Lee and Gregory Kenneth Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00454
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Sgt. Marshall, Bullock Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dewayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peacock v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Lt. Clemmons, Nurse Practitioner Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Peacock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ledbetter v. Pettaway et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00276
Defendant:
Nurse Pettaway, Health Care Unit, Sergeant Williams and others
Plaintiff:
James A. Ledbetter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dortch v. Jones (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00334
Plaintiff:
Harold L. Dortch
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dortch v. Crawford et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00293
Plaintiff:
Harold L Dortch and Harold L. Dortch
Defendant:
Patrice Richie Jones, Mrs. Parker, Nurse Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morton v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00172
Plaintiff:
Mark Twain Morton
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Steven T. Marshall and Patrice Richie Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.