Cases 81 - 90 of 22,062
Murray v. Southern Springs 401(k) Retirement Plan et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Plaintiff:
Naziree Murray
Defendant:
Southern Springs 401(k) Retirement Plan and Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Glenn v. ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
as 2:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Qiana Glenn
Defendant:
ATR Auto Transport & Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Byerley v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Byerley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Greene v. Bhuiyan
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Chaquita Greene
Defendant:
Mohammad Bhuiyan and Mohammad Ali Bhuiyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Randolph County Equine and Agricultural Association, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture - Rural Development et al
as 3:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Randolph County Equine and Agricultural Association, Inc. and Stephanie Herren
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture - Rural Development and Allen Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Davis v. Chaney (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Isiah Davis
Defendant:
Deontie L. Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Wendy's Inc. (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Wendy's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
