Cases 1 - 10 of 467
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sylvester v. Rawlins
as 1:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rawlins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts et al v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
William Roberts and Sydnee Roberts
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Peterson v. Attorney General of Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Robert Emile Peterson
Defendant:
Attorney General of Alabama, Department of Public Safety, Mobile County Sheriff's Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDaniel v. USA
as 1:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
Robert Christopher McDaniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hartenfels v. Presley et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Hartenfels
Defendant:
Trevin G. Presley, Mid Star Timber Harvesting, Inc., Tammy Lucus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Doe v. Spring Hill College et al
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Spring Hill College, Craig McVey, William Robert Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Roberts et al v. Prime Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00241
Plaintiff:
Clarence L. Roberts and Arkyla Miller
Defendant:
Prime Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
