Cases 31 - 40 of 831,062
Ortiz v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 1:2024cv04418
Plaintiff:
Miguel Ortiz
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jones v. Smith
as 9:2024cv03624
Plaintiff:
Rosalind G Jones
Defendant:
Bonnie S Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
ATECHGOV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00954
Plaintiff:
ATECHGOV, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Michele v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
as 3:2024cv01562
Plaintiff:
Scott-Cunningham Michele
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Cassar v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 7:2024cv04743
Plaintiff:
Alfred Jr. Cassar
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Sahakian v. Slootman et al
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Karolin Sahakian
Defendant:
Frank Slootman, Teresa Briggs, Jeremy Burton and others
Jenkins v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Leroy Jenkins
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and John and Jane Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Barbour International, Inc. v. C & A Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Defendant:
C & A Marketing, Inc. also known as C + A Global doing business as Hike Crew, C, Nationbond Enterprise Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbour International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024bk10810
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
