Cases 121 - 130 of 107,540
Steven Gibbons v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11148
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GIBBONS
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC., WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS U.S. INC and REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Berger v. 22nd State Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
The State of Alabama
Not Yet Classified:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
22nd State Bank, Christopher Watkins, FEB Bancshares Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Labat
as 1:2024cv01565
Plaintiff:
Adam Lee, III
Defendant:
Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Brice (CONSENT)
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Tonya Robinson
Defendant:
Jay S. Brice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fantel v. Department Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Department Homeland Security, State of Rhode Island, Boston Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Raymond v. Hillsborough County, Florida et al
as 8:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Edward Raymond
Defendant:
Hillsborough County, Florida, Hillsborough County Sheriff's Office, Corey Clarity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Monica Taylor v. City of Mobile Police Department
as 24-11888
Plaintiff:
MONICA TAYLOR
Defendant:
CITY OF MOBILE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Tomko v. Martin
as 6:2024cv01063
Plaintiff:
Lee Michael Tomko
Defendant:
Bruno Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
