Cases 41 - 50 of 653
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
VOTE.ORG et al v. BYRD et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP
Defendant:
CORD BYRD, KIM BARTON, CHRISTOPHER MILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Renardo Lewis, et al v. City Of Marietta, et al
as 23-10614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENARDO NEHEMIAH LEWIS and LUBREEZE LEWIS-FRANKLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MARIETTA, DAN FLYNN, ENRIQUE MALLEN and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv20624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Brandon Nix v. Lee Mobley, et al
as 23-10378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDON NIX
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE MOBLEY and CHARLES LEWIS
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Grissom v. Merkle et al
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mark Grissom
Defendant:
John Merkle, Nathan Whitaker, Tony Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
