Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Rafael Petitphait v. Ofc Aldridge, et al
as 24-11716
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL J. PETITPHAIT
Defendant:
OFC ALDRIDGE, #A91123, OFC KUZMA, #12480, OFC DARMALINJUM, #33564 and others
Sellers v. Leshan et al
as 1:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
John Sellers
Defendant:
Leslie Leshan and JPL Pasadena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petitphait v. Aldridge et al
as 6:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Rafael J. Petitphait
Defendant:
Ofc Aldridge, Ofc Kuzma, Ofc Darmalinjum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sellers v. Mullen
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Allen Sellers
Defendant:
Leonard Mullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petitphait v. Winter Springs Police Department et al
as 6:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Rafael J. Petitphait
Defendant:
Winter Springs Police Department, Ofc. Aldridge, Orlando Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Petitphait v. Ofc. Aldridge et al
as 6:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Rafael J. Petitphait
Defendant:
Ofc. Aldridge, Ofc. Kuzma, Ofc. Darmalinjum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
South v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Kayla South
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Kari Pearce, Christopher Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Sellers et al
as 2:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jones
Defendant:
Marcus Sellers and Brookside, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
