Cases 131 - 140 of 2,770
Jones v. Lamb et al
as 3:2023cv00926
Plaintiff:
Corian Jones
Defendant:
T. Lamb, D. Allen, K. Tomlinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNGBLOOD v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2023cv12143
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, DEBRA PERRY, J S EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Pledger
as 4:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Alex Monroe
Defendant:
Allen Pledger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERRE v. KOLODZEIJ et al
as 3:2023cv12771
Plaintiff:
MARCAUREL A PIERRE
Defendant:
J KOLODZEIJ, COREY SETTLEMIRES, AARON M STEPHENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudisel v. Catina et al
as 1:2023cv22052
Plaintiff:
Roderick J. Rudisel
Defendant:
Rudy Catina, Jino Milfort, Allen Daisy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ALLEN v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00226
Petitioner:
MICHAEL L ALLEN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Dills
as 1:2023cv02650
Petitioner:
Tracy M. Jones
Respondent:
Allen Dills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. Dawson County Judicial Circuit et al
as 2:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Justin Noelle Rivers
Defendant:
Dawson County Judicial Circuit, Dawson County Detention Center, Dawson County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Duffie et al
as 3:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Sherrod Montgomery
Defendant:
Officer Drew Duffie, Investigator Kimberly Biggs, Corporal Sam Hack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 2:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
