Cases 71 - 80 of 22,908
Boykin v. Unknown
as 4:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tyrone Boykin
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Defendant:
Ebony C Tucker, Funeral Home and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Margiee Vanessa Bonilla Rojas
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bush v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08008
Petitioner:
Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Kelli Wise, Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sylvester v. Rowlins et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rowlins and Jimmie Brayboy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sylvester v. Rowlins (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Brandon Sylvester
Defendant:
Robert Rowlins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Morgan et al
as 5:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
Jessie James Watkins
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliver v. Ward et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
Cam Ward, Leigh Gwanthney, Darryl Littleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Elliott et al
as 7:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Milton Wright
Defendant:
Elliott, Hill, Dixie Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
