Cases 1 - 10 of 405
Brown v. Hamm et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Carvell Tony Brown
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, Captain Walker, Lt. Corcino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Zavala v. C. Nash, et al
as 24-10735
Plaintiff:
DAVID ZAVALA
Defendant:
C. NASH, WHITEHEAD, BROWNFIELD and others
Kirkland v. Danzig et al
as 8:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Steven Kirkland
Defendant:
David Danzig, Scot Peterson, Jennifer Nobles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Keiron Kenneth Holmes, Sr., Micky Eugene Hamilton, Jed Allen Taylor and others
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, John T. Wilcher, Chatham County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)(MEMBER)
as 2:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Derrick LaWayne Daniels
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Gwendolyn Babers, Officer Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenel Joseph v. K. Williams, et al
as 23-13237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENEL JOSEPH
Defendant / Appellee:
K. WILLIAMS, WARDEN, M. NEAL and others
Peterson v. USA
as 1:2023cv04468
Petitioner:
Enobahkare Peterson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Peterson v. USA
as 1:2023cv04469
Petitioner:
Enobahkare Peterson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WILSON v. INGRAM et al
as 5:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
BERNARD D WILSON
Defendant:
INGRAM, GRANGER, D JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Dusnik et al
as 8:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
Billy Jack Peterson
Defendant:
Ashley Dusnik, Patrick Kane and Judge Lon S. Arend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
