Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Robbins v. Booth et al
as 3:2020cv01115
Defendant:
Emmondo Reeder, Josh Smith, Michael Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Matt Robbins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson-Carter v. Rape Crisis Center et al
as 4:2019cv00122
Defendant:
Katie Joyner-Barber, Mark Revenew, Lynne Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Kesha Gibson-Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Fasking et al v. Merrill
as 2:2018cv00809
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Fasking, Herbert Hicks and Heather Lynn Boothe
Defendant:
John H. Merrill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony of Lowrey Family et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv03177
Plaintiff:
Anthony of Lowrey Family and Anthony Blake Lowrey Estate Trust
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph J. Groan, John Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Jackson v. Booth et al
as 6:2016cv00753
Plaintiff:
Preston L. Jackson, III
Defendant:
Matthew Booth, Unknown Officer and Jennifer Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. King et al (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 3:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tate
Defendant:
Dan King , Barnese Adair-Wallace , Ron Booth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Booth v. Broward Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2016cv60203
Plaintiff:
Shonney Daniel Booth
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff's Office and FL State Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOLLEY v. CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS et al
as 1:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOLLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF HIGH SPRINGS and EDWIN BOOTH
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Cheatham et al v. Hartselle, City of et al
as 5:2014cv00397
Plaintiff:
Garlin Cheatham, Jr and Sally Booth Cheatham
Defendant:
Hartselle, City of and Morgan County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coburn v. Booth et al
as 2:2009cv00123
Plaintiff:
Everette Francis Coburn
Defendant:
Joseph H Booth and Paula O'Neal Free
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
