Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rhodes v. Judge Tom S. Lee et al
as 1:2023cv02680
Plaintiff:
Jon Allen Rhodes
Defendant:
US District Court Judge Tom S. Lee, Supreme Court Of Appeals, 20th District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-11017
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Charles Rankin v. Board of Regents of the Univ., et al
as 17-14483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES R. RANKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, LAURA MCCULLOUGH, HARRY JONES and others
Wilson v. Blaylock et al
as 6:2016cv01064
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
G.B. Blaylock, Doug Webb Guin, Carol Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankine v. Dantiste et al
as 9:2015cv80275
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankine
Defendant:
Yanick Dantiste, John L. Phillips, Krista Marx and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Hueytown Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv01886
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lee Robinson
Defendant:
Chuck Hagler , L B Rankin , Todd Easterwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CABALLERO v. MEJIA et al
as 4:2013cv00630
Plaintiff:
ADAIRYS CABALLERO
Defendant:
JAIME MEJIA, TANYA JUNKERMEIER, MONICA D. RANKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Caffey v. Alabama Supreme Court et al
as 2:2010cv03050
Plaintiff:
Sherryl Snodgrass Caffey
Defendant:
Alabama Supreme Court, Sue Bell Cobb, Champ Lyons, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rankin, M.D. v. Royal Caribbean, LTD
as 1:2009cv22794
Plaintiff:
Jerry Rankin, M.D.
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean, LTD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cole v. Gwinnett County et al
as 1:2007cv00251
Plaintiff:
Carol Cole
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, Doug Daum, Mike Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
