Cases 1 - 10 of 449
Custis v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02664
Plaintiff:
Terrell D. Custis, Sr.
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia and Shaqueil Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Veteran Affairs et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
Veteran Affairs, Health Department and Glen Holding Properties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. U.S. Post Office (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Antuane D. Daniel, Sr.
Defendant:
U.S. Post Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fantel v. Department Homeland Security et al
as 3:2024cv00594
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Department Homeland Security, State of Rhode Island, Boston Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mitchell et al v. Selma City Board of Education et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Trumaine Mitchell, Sr. and Latonya Mines
Defendant:
Selma City Board of Education and Stoney Pritchett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fantel v. Handley et al
as 3:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Jeremy Handley, Stacey O'Neil, Joseph H. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALE v. HALE et al
as 4:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
RODRICK HALE
Defendant:
RENEE HALE, TERRENCE HALE, TERRY MITHELL, SR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McGrath v. Rice-Tanner et al
as 8:2024cv01214
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee McGrath, Sr.
Defendant:
Alex W Rice-Tanner and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
WRIGHT v. LEO
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
LAVETTE M WRIGHT
Defendant:
MAXIE WILLIAM LEO, SR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
