Cases 1 - 7 of 7
MAJORITY FORWARD et al v. BEN HILL COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
MAJORITY FORWARD, GAMALIEL WARREN TURNER, SR. and DEBRA LEWIS
Defendant:
DAVID WALKER, DIANE SCRIMPSHIRE, CINDI DUNLAP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The New Georgia Project et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv01986
Defendant:
Tim McFalls, John Mangano, Brad Raffensperger and others
Plaintiff:
Reagan Jennings, The New Georgia Project, Candace Woodall and others
Amicus Curiae:
Public Interest Legal Foundation and Landmark Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwight et al v. Kemp
as 1:2018cv02869
Plaintiff:
Pamelia Dwight , Benjamin Dotson , Hudman Evans, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Brian Kemp
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 20501
Smith v. The State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2015cv00625
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus D. Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
The State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Newton, et al v. State of Alabama, et al(PANEL)(MEMBER)
as 2:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Newton , Alabama Democratic Conference , Framon Weaver, Sr. and others
Defendant:
State of Alabama , Robert J. Bentley and Beth Chapman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Martin et al v. Augusta Richmond County Georgia, Commissioner et al
as 1:2012cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Martin , Charles N. Cody, Sr. , Bobby D. Harper and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County Georgia, Commission , Deke S. Copenhaver , County Board of Education of Richmond County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of College Park et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2008cv01464
Plaintiff:
City of College Park, City of College Park, City of College Park and others
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Shirley Franklin and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Action to enforce 26th amendment right to vote
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
