Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Partlow v Chambers
as 4:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Heath D. Partlow
Respondent:
Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Helvey v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange County)
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Heath Lee Helvey
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FAISON v. HEATH
as 1:2021cv23574
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FAISON
Defendant:
HARLEN HEATH and WARDEN CALHOUN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FAISON v. HEATH
as 5:2021cv00175
Petitioner:
MATTHEW FAISON
Respondent:
HARLEN HEATH and WARDEN CALHOUN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bethea v. Dunn et al
as 2:2019cv00534
Respondent:
Jefferson S Dunn, Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Heath Harden
Petitioner:
Ladipo Chad Bethea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Epps v. Collins et al
as 3:2018cv01017
Defendant:
Zachary Collins, Heath Taylor, Kenneth Davis and others
Plaintiff:
K. A. G., Dammuon Epps, K. G. E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eiland v. Russell County District Court et al (INMATE 1)
as 3:2018cv00799
Defendant:
Dist. Court, Heath Taylor, The Russell Commission of Russell County Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Lee Eiland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Long v. Hall et al
as 4:2018cv00001
Petitioner:
David Heath Long
Respondent:
Hilton Hall and Commissioner of the Georgia Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fuhlman v. State of Florida et al
as 2:2017cv00560
Petitioner:
Heath L. Fuhlman
Respondent:
State of Florida and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abraham Teklemariam v. Heath Simon
as 17-12987
Petitioner - Appellant:
ABRAHAM GEBREZGABIHER TEKLEMARIAM
Respondent - Appellee:
HEATH SIMON, HQ Rio Chief, US Department of Homeland Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
