Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Rodriguez v. Warden, Northwest Florida Reception Center
as 1:2022cv20152
Plaintiff:
Dario Micheal Rodriguez, David, Darius and others
Defendant:
Warden, Northwest Florida Reception Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. ESCAMBIA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2021cv01540
Plaintiff:
DARIUS A BROOKS
Defendant:
ESCAMBIA BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ESCAMBIA COUNTY JAIL and ESCAMBIA COUNTY SHERIFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. McCoy et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00354
Defendant:
Maryln Hursley, Kenneth Brooks, Darius Woods and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mangram v. Duval County Jail
as 3:2020cv01232
Defendant:
Duval County Jail
Plaintiff:
Darius Mangram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00759
Defendant:
Jennifer McCovery, Jesse Stanford, J. Shepard and others
Plaintiff:
Darius Christopher Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett et al v. Tony
as 0:2020cv61113
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Gonzales Guerra, Disability Rights Florida, Inc., Jesse Callins and others
Defendant:
Gregory Tony
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. FOUNTAIN et al
as 3:2020cv05440
Defendant:
GRAHAM FOUNTAIN, OKALOOSA COUNTY JAIL and ERIC ESMOND
Plaintiff:
DARIUS DARNELL JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2019cv00490
Plaintiff:
DARIUS D SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHIEF COUNSELOR PEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. SPD et al
as 4:2019cv00331
Defendant:
Detective Johnson, DA and SPD
Plaintiff:
Darius Jebrial Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
