Cases 71 - 80 of 307
Reeves v. Siddiq et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2012cv00904
Plaintiff:
Richard Kyle Reeves
Defendant:
Lt. Scott, Tahir Siddiq, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seals v. Alabama, State of et al
as 5:2012cv02751
Plaintiff:
Gary Seals, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Department of Corrections, Jerrydean Cunningham and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petite v. Hetzel (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Isadore Petite
Defendant:
Gary Hetzel, Kenneth Sconyers, Sherry Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newman v. May et al
as 3:2012cv02645
Plaintiff:
Jason Richard Newman
Defendant:
Ronnie May, Colbert County Sheriff's Department, Colbert County Jail Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollingsworth v. Barbara
as 1:2012cv00481
Plaintiff:
Richard Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Dr. Barbara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Farrell et al
as 1:2012cv00439
Plaintiff:
Rodney M. Lundy
Defendant:
Jerry Farrell, Barry Dunning and Richard Drew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollingsworth v. Barrett et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00503
Plaintiff:
Richard Joseph Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Bobby Barrett, Captain Hicks, Mark Loman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brumfield v. Strange et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00478
Plaintiff:
George A. Brumfield
Defendant:
Luther Strange, Kathy Holt, Richard Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hollingsworth v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00472
Plaintiff:
Richard Joseph Hollingsworth
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Irvin Harris and Ms. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Bentley et al
as 6:2012cv01988
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Wright
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas, Bob Riley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
