Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Jones v. Higgins et al
as 2:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jones
Defendant:
Judge James R. Tuten, Jr., Glynn County and Keith Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Hobbs et al
as 2:2024cv00086
Defendant:
Keith Higgins, Jackie Johnson and Johnnie Hobbs
Plaintiff:
Keith Higgins, Jackie Johnson and Johnnie Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CREAMER v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
SEAN LEE CREAMER
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JEFFERY BENNETT, DAVID HIGGINS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Lush et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Nigel Lush, Keith Higgins, Glynn County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. HIGGINS et al
as 4:2020cv00463
Defendant:
JEFFERY E LEWIS, CANDICE K BROWER and BRIAN A HIGGINS
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Pyburn v. Sheri Dole, et al
as 18-11446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS L. PYBURN
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERI DOLE, City of Brunswick Police Department; in her individual and official capacity, BARBRA RETZER, GBI Forensic Investigator; in her individual and official capacity, STEPHEN KELLY, Brunswick Judicial Circuit; in his individual and official capacity and others
McConnell v. Doss et al
as 2:2017cv01483
Plaintiff:
Christopher McConnell
Defendant:
Officer Doss, Officer Higgins, Officer Green and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steverson v. Gully et al
as 3:2017cv00913
Plaintiff:
Willie Steverson
Defendant:
Gully and Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAXWELL v. HIGGINS
as 4:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K MAXWELL
Defendant:
BRIAN A HIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAXWELL v. HIGGINS
as 4:2017cv00282
Plaintiff:
DANIEL K MAXWELL
Defendant:
BRIAN HIGGINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
