Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Watson v. NAPH Care et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00724
Plaintiff:
Andrew Houston Watson
Defendant:
NAPH Care, Montgomery County Jail, Lamarquis Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonon v. Wilhoite et al
as 4:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
China Lonon
Defendant:
Matthew C. Wilhoite, Brian Deal and U.S. Marshal's Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dinkle v. U.S. Marshal Service et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Steven Joshua Dinkle
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal Service, Montgomery City Jail, Mac Sim Butler Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. U.S. Marshals Office
as 3:2021cv01183
Plaintiff:
Clifford P. Turner
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 4:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray White, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals and LaSalle Corrections Irwin County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. U.S. Marshals et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00285
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Department of Justice and U.S. Marshals
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Cargill and Quincetta Y. Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2020cv01091
Defendant:
Mark Mahon, Ronnie Fussell, Attorney General William Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua L Gordon and Jahmal C. Freeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. U.S. Marshals
as 4:2020cv00185
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. U.S. Marshals et al
as 4:2020cv00111
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
U.S. District Court for Georgia Savannah Division and U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. U.S. Marshals
as 4:2020cv00093
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
