Cases 1 - 10 of 37
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024mc00280
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
SCOTT v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WAYNE SCOTT
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Cobble v. United States of America et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019mc00016
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3720
Cobble v. United States of America et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00642
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Defendant:
United States of America and Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3720
In Re: Sharon Bost v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 2:2019mc03887
Petitioner:
Alabama Department of Corrections
In Re:
Sharon Bost v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bost
Jackson v. JPay Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv20341
Plaintiff:
Deondre Lovertur Jackson and Deandre Lovertur Jackson
Defendant:
United States, JPay Corporation and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Baker, Jr v. Harris County District Attorney et al
as 6:2018cv00010
Petitioner:
Roger Lee Baker, Jr
Respondent:
Harris County District Attorney, Talbot County Superior Court, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
