Cases 21 - 30 of 134
Bexley-Lovell v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03046
Defendant:
John Does #1-4, CSX Transportation, Inc. and ABC Corporations #1-3
Plaintiff:
Marla Bexley-Lovell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boyette v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00034
Plaintiff:
Donald Ken Boyette
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Myrick v. Alabama & Tennessee River Railway LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01417
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc, Omnitrax Inc and Alabama & Tennessee River Railway LLC
Plaintiff:
Donald J Myrick
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
Stapleton v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00413
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSX) and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DEVON M STAPLETON and Devon M. Stapleton
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Carter v. CSX Transportation Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00464
Defendant:
John Layne, Nicholas Barclay, CSX Transportation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Carter
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Carver v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00039
Plaintiff:
Brandon Carver
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Kempf v. CSX Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00498
Plaintiff:
Catherin Kempf
Defendant:
CSX Corporation, CSX Transportation, Inc. and National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kerr v. CSX Transportation Inc
as 7:2018cv00342
Plaintiff:
Roger Kerr
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Grimes v. Sysco Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00638
Plaintiff:
Terry G. Grimes
Defendant:
Freshpoint Atlanta, Inc. , CSX Transportation, Inc. and Sysco Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Johnson v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00228
Defendant:
Progress Rail Services Corporation, Defendant ABC, Defendant DEF and others
Plaintiff:
Larakus M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
